[PATCH 4.12 020/106] userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Aug 09 2017 - 13:17:35 EST


4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9d95aa4bada24be35bb94827a55e1d6e243d866e upstream.

In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with
outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor. Returning -ENOSPC
instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to
distinguish this case from other error conditions.

Unfortunately I overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when updating
userfaultd_copy().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1501136819-21857-1-git-send-email-rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1645,6 +1645,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct u
ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start,
uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
mmput(ctx->mm);
+ } else {
+ return -ENOSPC;
}
if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
return -EFAULT;