Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: Initialise mod[] in bpf_trace_printk

From: James Hogan
Date: Wed Aug 09 2017 - 03:39:35 EST


On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:54:33PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:20:05 +0100
>
> > cool, i hadn't realised unmentioned elements in an initialiser are
> > always zeroed, even when non-global/static, so had interpreted the
> > whole array as uninitialised. learn something new every day :-)
> > sorry for the noise.
>
> You didn't have to know in the first place, you could have simply
> compiled the code into assembler by running:
>
> make kernel/trace/bpf_trace.s
>
> and seen for yourself before putting all of this time and effort into
> this patch and discussion.
>
> If you don't know what the compiler does, simply look!

Well, thats the danger of wrongly thinking I already knew what it did in
this case. Anyway like I said, I'm sorry for the noise and wasting your
time (but please consider looking at the other patch which is certainly
a more real issue).

Thanks
James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature