Re: [PATCH] gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver

From: Keerthy
Date: Tue Aug 08 2017 - 00:17:35 EST




On Tuesday 08 August 2017 06:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> 2017-08-08 0:37 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Adding "interrupts" property in DT causes
>>> of_pupulate_default_populate() to assign virtual IRQ numbers
>>> before driver probing. So it does not work well with IRQ domain hierarchy.
>>
>> I think I heard some noise about this the week before.
>>
>>> For pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c,
>>> I do not see "interrupts", so it just straight maps the irq numbers.
>>
>> I think OMAP and DaVinci does someting similar too. This is from a recent
>> DaVinci patch from Keerthy:
>>
>> +Example for 66AK2G:
>> +
>> +gpio0: gpio@2603000 {
>> + compatible = "ti,k2g-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio";
>> + reg = <0x02603000 0x100>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 432 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 433 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 434 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 435 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 437 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 438 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 439 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 440 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> + ti,ngpio = <144>;
>> + ti,davinci-gpio-unbanked = <0>;
>> + clocks = <&k2g_clks 0x001b 0x0>;
>> + clock-names = "gpio";
>> +};
>>
>>
>> That looks fairly similar.
>>
>
> I do not think so.
>
>
> I do not see .alloc hook in drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> so this driver is unrelated to IRQ domain hierarchy.

Hi Masahiro,

Yes CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY is not enabled in keystone_defconfig or
davinci_all_defconfig.

Regards,
Keerthy

>
>
>
>
>
>