Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] load_balance() fixes for affinity

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On 6/7/2017 1:18 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> Co-authored-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [V5]
> -updated comment to explain the "why" behind the redo check
> -fixed panic triggered from active_load_balance_cpu_stop()
>
> [V4]
> -restricted active cpus mask to the domain span
> -fixed dst_cpu masking logic to work for the entire local group
>
> [V3]
> -fixed botched subject lines
>
> [V2]
> -Corrected use of Signed-off-by tags
> -Removed temp cpumask variable from stack
>
> Jeffrey Hugo (2):
>    sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path
>    sched/fair: Remove group imbalance from calculate_imbalance()
>
>   kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Peter (and/or Ingo?), is this series likely to make 4.13?  V5 has been 
quiet, so I'm not sure if folks are happy with things, or just haven't 
had time to review.

Thanks

--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.