Re: [PATCH 11/16] powerpc: vio_cmo: use dev_groups and not dev_attrs for bus_type

[Michael Ellerman]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:23:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:53:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> >> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:12:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> >> >> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > The dev_attrs field has long been "depreciated" and is finally being
>> >> >> > removed, so move the driver to use the "correct" dev_groups field
>> >> >> > instead for struct bus_type.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> >> >> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> This one needed a bit more work to get building, the incremental diff is
>> >> >> below. We need a forward declaration of name, devspec and modalias,
>> >> >> which is a bit weird, but that's how the code is currently structured.
>> >> >> And there's dev and bus attributes with the same name, so that needed an
>> >> >> added "bus".
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I booted v2 of patch 10 and this one and everything looks identical to
>> >> >> upstream.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ah, many thanks, this was on my todo list to fix up today.
>> >> >
>> >> > But you renamed the sysfs files when you added "bus" to the function
>> >> > names, are you sure you want to do that?  I don't mind, but if you
>> >> > happen to have userspace tools that look at those files, they just broke
>> >> > :(
>> >> 
>> >> Ugh crap, no that won't work.
>> >> 
>> >> I didn't see it when I tested because my machine doesn't have the CMO
>> >> feature enabled.
>> >> 
>> >> I guess we have to open code some of the BUS_ATTR_RO() etc. so we can
>> >> avoid the name clash.
>> >
>> > Or split it into multiple files, I've solved this that way in the past.
>> > You shouldn't have to "open code" BUS_ATTR_RO().
>> 
>> It just requires one use of __ATTR(), which seems simpler than splitting
>> the file in two.
>> 
>> Here's a new incremental diff against your patch.
>> 
>> I confirmed none of the cmo names changed, result after is:
>> 
>> ./devices/vio/cmo_desired
>> ./devices/vio/cmo_allocated
>> ./devices/vio/cmo_entitled
>> ./devices/vio/cmo_allocs_failed
>> ./devices/vio/71000000/cmo_desired
>> ./devices/vio/71000000/cmo_allocated
>> ./devices/vio/71000000/cmo_entitled
>> ./devices/vio/71000000/cmo_allocs_failed
>> ./devices/vio/30000000/cmo_desired
>> ./devices/vio/30000000/cmo_allocated
>> ./devices/vio/30000000/cmo_entitled
>> ./devices/vio/30000000/cmo_allocs_failed
>> ./devices/vio/2000/cmo_desired
>> ./devices/vio/2000/cmo_allocated
>> ./devices/vio/2000/cmo_entitled
>> ./devices/vio/2000/cmo_allocs_failed
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_high
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_spare
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_reserve_size
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_desired
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_entitled
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_excess_free
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_excess_size
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_min
>> ./bus/vio/cmo_curr
>
> Thanks for this, it seems to have passed all of the 0-day testing.  I'll
> go apply it to my "real" tree now, thanks again for the help.

No worries. It'll get some more build & boot testing from my CI once it's
in linux-next.

cheers