Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM / domains: Protect reading loop over list of domains

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Jun 12 2017 - 09:10:10 EST


On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 02:57:21PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 9 June 2017 at 18:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:08:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> The pm_genpd_present() iterates over list of domains so grabbing a
> >> gpd_list_lock mutex is necessary before calling it. Otherwise we could
> >> end up in iterating over and modifying the list at the same time.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> >> index 2e8d0f423507..2a6935dc0164 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> >> @@ -1099,8 +1099,13 @@ static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
> >> struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> >>
> >> genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
>
> Actually there may be potential problem here as we may end up trying
> to use the container_of() call for a PM domain, not being a genpd but
> something else.
>
> >> - if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
> >> +
> >> + mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock);
> >> + if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd)) {
> >> + mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
> >> return;
> >> + }
> >> + mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
>
> Perhaps convert the hole thing above to call genpd_lookup_dev() instead?

Indeed, that would solve both problems. Thanks, I'll fix this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof