Re: [PATCH 01/10] sched/deadline: track the active utilization

From: Luca Abeni
Date: Thu Jun 08 2017 - 04:43:32 EST


On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:31:25 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * luca abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Active utilization is defined as the total utilization of active
> > (TASK_RUNNING) tasks queued on a runqueue. Hence, it is increased
> > when a task wakes up and is decreased when a task blocks.
> >
> > When a task is migrated from CPUi to CPUj, immediately subtract the
> > task's utilization from CPUi and add it to CPUj. This mechanism is
> > implemented by modifying the pull and push functions.
> > Note: this is not fully correct from the theoretical point of view
> > (the utilization should be removed from CPUi only at the 0 lag
> > time), a more theoretically sound solution is presented in the
> > next patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> So that SOB chain is not valid - either Juri needs to be the From:
> author, or it should be an Acked-by (or Reviewed-by).
>
> For now I've converted this to:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>

Sorry, my fault: I must have misunderstood how to use the Signed-off-by
stuff.

The story here is that I took a patch originally developed by Juri and
fixed and I heavily modified it. Since the current patch is very
different from the original one, Juri suggested I should by the "From:"
author, and I simply added his Signed-off-by to acknowledge that he was
the author of the original patch.

If Juri is ok with your change, I agree with it.


Thanks,
Luca