Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm: sun4i: improve hardware read out

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Tue May 30 2017 - 23:35:16 EST


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Implement .get_state instead of only reading the polarity at probe time.
> This allows to get the proper state, period and duty cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 1284ffa05921..175a69245a8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
>
> #define PWM_DTY_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>
> +#define PWM_REG_PRD(reg) ((((reg) >> 16) & PWM_PRD_MASK) + 1)
> +#define PWM_REG_DTY(reg) ((reg) & PWM_DTY_MASK)
> +#define PWM_REG_PRESCAL(reg, chan) (((reg) >> ((chan) * PWMCH_OFFSET)) & PWM_PRESCAL_MASK)
> +
> #define BIT_CH(bit, chan) ((bit) << ((chan) * PWMCH_OFFSET))
>
> static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
> @@ -96,6 +100,46 @@ static inline void sun4i_pwm_writel(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *chip,
> writel(val, chip->base + offset);
> }
>
> +static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u64 clk_rate, tmp;
> + u32 val;
> + unsigned int prescaler;
> +
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> +
> + val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> +
> + if ((val == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) && sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
> + prescaler = 1;
> + else
> + prescaler = prescaler_table[PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm)];
> +
> + if (prescaler == 0)
> + return;

This looks like an invalid state. How does the PWM core handle it?
Or rather, how does the driver signal an invalid state?

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>

> +
> + if (val & BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm))
> + state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> + else
> + state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> +
> + if (val & BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING | PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm))
> + state->enabled = true;
> + else
> + state->enabled = false;
> +
> + val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + tmp = prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC * PWM_REG_DTY(val);
> + state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> +
> + tmp = prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC * PWM_REG_PRD(val);
> + state->period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, clk_rate);
> +}
> +
> static int sun4i_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> {
> @@ -257,6 +301,7 @@ static const struct pwm_ops sun4i_pwm_ops = {
> .set_polarity = sun4i_pwm_set_polarity,
> .enable = sun4i_pwm_enable,
> .disable = sun4i_pwm_disable,
> + .get_state = sun4i_pwm_get_state,
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> @@ -316,8 +361,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct sun4i_pwm_chip *pwm;
> struct resource *res;
> - u32 val;
> - int i, ret;
> + int ret;
> const struct of_device_id *match;
>
> match = of_match_device(sun4i_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> @@ -353,24 +397,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm);
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable PWM clock\n");
> - goto clk_error;
> - }
> -
> - val = sun4i_pwm_readl(pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> - for (i = 0; i < pwm->chip.npwm; i++)
> - if (!(val & BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, i)))
> - pwm_set_polarity(&pwm->chip.pwms[i],
> - PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk);
> -
> return 0;
> -
> -clk_error:
> - pwmchip_remove(&pwm->chip);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static int sun4i_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.11.0
>