Re: [GIT PULL] MMC fixes for v.4.12 rc3 - take 2/2

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Sun May 28 2017 - 06:26:14 EST


Hi Olof,

+Daniel

On 26 May 2017 at 18:24, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> Here are a couple of mmc and arm64-dts fixes intended for v4.12 rc3.
>> They are based on v4.12-rc2.
>>
>> Details are as usual found in the signed tag. Please pull this in!
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Ulf Hansson
>>
>>
>> The following changes since commit 08332893e37af6ae779367e78e444f8f9571511d:
>>
>> Linux 4.12-rc2 (2017-05-21 19:30:23 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git tags/mmc-v4.12-rc2
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to ea452678734eb782126f999bf5c4fb3e71d3b196:
>>
>> arm64: dts: hikey: Fix WiFi support (2017-05-23 14:18:10 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This pull request contains fixes to make the WiFi work again for the ARM64
>> Hikey board. Together with a couple of DTS updates for the Hikey board we have
>> also extended the mmc pwrseq_simple, to support a new power-off-delay-us DT
>> property, as that was required to enable a graceful power off sequence for the
>> WiFi chip.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Daniel Lezcano (2):
>> mfd: dts: hi655x: Add clock binding for the pmic
>> arm64: dts: hikey: Add clock for the pmic mfd
>>
>> Ulf Hansson (6):
>> mmc: dt: pwrseq-simple: Invent power-off-delay-us
>> mmc: pwrseq_simple: Parse DTS for the power-off-delay-us property
>> arm64: dts: hi6220: Move the fixed_5v_hub regulator to the hikey dts
>> arm64: dts: hikey: Add the SYS_5V and the VDD_3V3 regulators
>> arm64: dts: hi6220: Move board data from the dwmmc nodes to hikey dts
>> arm64: dts: hikey: Fix WiFi support
>
>
> These are a lot of changes to fix a regression. How was it introduced?

It was several releases ago it got broken, exactly which one I can't
really tell.

I suspect this also is related to an upgrade of the boot loader, as in
the earlier version of the series there where a pmic clock driver
included, however it got picked up for 4.12.

Looping in Daniel, just to see if he have some comments on this.

No matter what, I still think it makes sense to pick this for 4.12
rcs, because it also simplifies for us for how to deal with the
mmc+arm64 dependency, since this needs to go together (to avoid
damaging the WiFi chip when power off)

>
> It would also have been useful if you pointed out the DT contents was
> already acked by Arnd (I had to go look at the contents since you only
> looped him in, and no other ARM-SoC maintainers).
>

Apologize about that! I will make that clear, if/when next time!

>
> -Olof

Kind regards
Uffe