[PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Sun May 28 2017 - 05:31:14 EST


It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I suggest this trivial patch should be picked individually per susbsystem.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
index 2a3f3b8946b998..a91920a49433c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
* SHDMA Device Tree bindings

-Sh-/r-mobile and r-car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
+Sh-/r-mobile and R-Car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
instances, capable of serving any of a common set of DMA slave devices, using
the same configuration. To describe this topology we require all compatible
SHDMA DT nodes to be placed under a DMA multiplexer node. All such compatible
--
2.11.0