Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: fix unsequenced modification and access warning

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Wed May 10 2017 - 03:15:18 EST


On Tue 09-05-17 23:53:28, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Clang flags this file with the -Wunsequenced error that GCC does not
> have.
>
> unsequenced modification and access to 'gfp_mask'
>
> It seems that gfp_mask is both read and written without a sequence point
> in between, which is undefined behavior.

Hmm. This is rather news to me. I thought that a = foo(a) is perfectly
valid. Same as a = b = c where c = foo(b) or is the problem in the
following .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask) initialization? If that is
the case then the current code is OKish because gfp_zone doesn't depend
on the gfp_mask modification. It is messy, right, but works as expected.

Anyway, we have a similar construct __node_reclaim

If you really want to change this code, and I would agree it would be
slightly less tricky, then I would suggest doing something like the
following instead
---
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5ebf468c5429..ba4b695e810e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
struct scan_control sc = {
.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
- .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)),
+ .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
.order = order,
.nodemask = nodemask,
@@ -2980,12 +2980,12 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
* 1 is returned so that the page allocator does not OOM kill at this
* point.
*/
- if (throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask))
+ if (throttle_direct_reclaim(sc.gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask))
return 1;

trace_mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin(order,
sc.may_writepage,
- gfp_mask,
+ sc.gfp_mask,
sc.reclaim_idx);

nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
@@ -3772,17 +3772,16 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
struct task_struct *p = current;
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
- int classzone_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
struct scan_control sc = {
.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
- .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)),
+ .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
.order = order,
.priority = NODE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY,
.may_writepage = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
.may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
.may_swap = 1,
- .reclaim_idx = classzone_idx,
+ .reclaim_idx = gfp_znoe(gfp_mask),
};

cond_resched();
@@ -3793,7 +3792,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
*/
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
p->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE;
- lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
+ lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs