Re: [PATCH] ACPI / IPMI: change warning to debug on timeout

[Corey Minyard]

Why would a timeout for a message be expected?  The BMC should
at least respond with an error for an incorrect message.

-corey

On 03/23/2017 10:32 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Getting timeout message from BMC when trying to read from a non-existent
> FRU. This is expected but warning is not.
>
> Let's reduce the warning to debug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> index 747c2ba..1b64419 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> @@ -429,8 +429,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
>   	if (msg->recv_type == IPMI_RESPONSE_RECV_TYPE &&
>   	    msg->msg.data_len == 1) {
>   		if (msg->msg.data[0] == IPMI_TIMEOUT_COMPLETION_CODE) {
> -			dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, true,
> -				      "Unexpected response (timeout).\n");
> +			dev_dbg_once(dev, "Unexpected response (timeout).\n");
>   			tx_msg->msg_done = ACPI_IPMI_TIMEOUT;
>   		}
>   		goto out_comp;