Re: [PATCH] mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:28:41AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > This patch simply uses __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly when allocating pages to
> > be mapped to the vmalloc space. Current users which add __GFP_HIGHMEM
> > are simplified and drop the flag.

btw, I had another idea for GFP_HIGHMEM -- remove it when CONFIG_HIGHMEM
isn't enabled.  Saves 26 bytes of .text and 64 bytes of .data on my
laptop's kernel build.  What do you think?

Also, I suspect the layout of bits is suboptimal from an assembly
language perspective.  I still mostly care about x86 which doesn't
benefit, so I'm not inclined to do the work, but certainly ARM, PA-RISC,
SPARC and Itanium would all benefit from having frequently-used bits
(ie those used in GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC) placed in the low 8 bits.

diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index 0fe0b6295ab5..d88cb532d7c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -16,7 +16,11 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
 
 /* Plain integer GFP bitmasks. Do not use this directly. */
 #define ___GFP_DMA		0x01u
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
 #define ___GFP_HIGHMEM		0x02u
+#else
+#define ___GFP_HIGHMEM		0x0u
+#endif
 #define ___GFP_DMA32		0x04u
 #define ___GFP_MOVABLE		0x08u
 #define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE	0x10u