Re: [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: wm831x watchdog really needs mfd

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Feb 28 2017 - 20:05:33 EST


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:48:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>> config WM831X_WATCHDOG
> >>> tristate "WM831x watchdog"
> >>> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >>> + depends on MFD_WM831X
> >>
> >> I prefer the fix proposed by Randy:
> >>
> >> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >> + depends on MFD_WM831X || (MFD_WM831X=y && COMPILE_TEST)
> >>
> >
> > Agreed, that's better.
>
> Actually I misread. They should be completely equivalent, the part after
> the || has no effect here.
>
Yes, I figured that out later as well.

Guenter