On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:I'm trying very hard not to get volunteered for ttm maintainer :-)
On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:I don't maintain a TTM tree any longer. Let's check with Daniel if he
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:Thanks for the reviews! Via which tree should we merge this?
Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>.
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED, because placement can contain
multiple caching flags. Trying to swap out such a BO would trip up the
BUG_ON(ttm->caching_state != tt_cached);
in ttm_tt_swapout.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
can merge it through drm-misc.
Nominally Alex&Christian have drm-misc commit rights, but they haven't
used them yet. But I think merging through drm-misc would make sense,
there's regular pull request trains for both -next and -fixes.
Or merge through the amd tree with Dave's ack, but I'd really like to get amd folks
into the drm-misc group ...
-Daniel