Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add i2c binding for mediatek MT2701 Soc Platform

[Matthias Brugger]

On 01/18/2017 07:07 AM, Jun Gao wrote:
> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This add i2c DT binding to i2c-mt6577.txt for MT2701.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt         |   11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
>  b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
> index 0ce6fa3..ef22ecf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
> @@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ The Mediatek's I2C controller is used to interface with
>  I2C devices.
>
>  Required properties:
>    - compatible: value should be either of the following.
> -      (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
> -      (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
> -      (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
> -      (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
> -      (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt2701-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt2701 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
> +	"mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
>    - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length of
>  memory
>      mapped region.
>    - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.

Actually what you need for mt2701 is what you put into the dts file:
compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c";

"mediatek,mt2701-i2c" alone is not supported in the driver.

While at it would you mind to fix the bindings description for the other 
SoCs as well?

Thanks,
Matthias