Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Xilinx NWL: Fix, do not check for legacy status in while loop

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Jan 23 2017 - 13:23:37 EST


On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> - The legacy status register value for particular INTx becomes low
> only after DEASSERT_INTx is received.
> - Few End Points take time for sending DEASSERT_INTx, checking
> legacy status register in while loop causes invoking of EP
> handler continuosly until DEASSERT_INTx is received.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> index 43eaa4a..c8b5a33 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -342,9 +342,10 @@ static void nwl_pcie_leg_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>
> chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + status = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, MSGF_LEG_STATUS) &
> + MSGF_LEG_SR_MASKALL;
>
> - while ((status = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, MSGF_LEG_STATUS) &
> - MSGF_LEG_SR_MASKALL) != 0) {
> + if (status != 0) {
> for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, INTX_NUM) {
> virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain,
> bit + 1);
>

But even if you only handle the interrupt once, it is still asserted,
right? You exit the low-level exception handler, only to take the
interrupt immediately again. So what is the gain here?

As an aside, please add a cover letter to your patch series. It is
immensely useful as a summary of what is being done, as well as an
anchor for the patches themselves.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...