Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration

[Alex Shi]

> Yeah, that could be problematic. The code snippet gives the general idea but it
> could be changed by for example by a flag telling the cpus when they enter idle
> to update their state_count. Or something like that.

Yes, this idea could be helpful.

But since the idle path isn't a hot path. and a few memory access won't 
cost a lot. So I doubt if the benefit could be measurable.


> But if you think the patchset is fine, it is ok, we can improve things afterwards.