[Acked] [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on embedded function names

From: Andy Whitcroft
Date: Wed Jan 04 2017 - 01:56:30 EST


On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:21:54PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Embedded function names are less appropriate to use when
> refactoring can cause function renaming. Prefer the use
> of "%s", __func__ to embedded function names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 982c52ca6473..4f53093a1b0b 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ sub process {
> my $in_header_lines = $file ? 0 : 1;
> my $in_commit_log = 0; #Scanning lines before patch
> my $has_commit_log = 0; #Encountered lines before patch
> - my $commit_log_possible_stack_dump = 0;
> + my $commit_log_possible_stack_dump = 0;
> my $commit_log_long_line = 0;
> my $commit_log_has_diff = 0;
> my $reported_maintainer_file = 0;
> @@ -2154,6 +2154,7 @@ sub process {
> my $realline = 0;
> my $realcnt = 0;
> my $here = '';
> + my $context_function; #undef'd unless there's a known function
> my $in_comment = 0;
> my $comment_edge = 0;
> my $first_line = 0;
> @@ -2192,7 +2193,8 @@ sub process {
> }
> #next;
> }
> - if ($rawline=~/^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@/) {
> + if ($rawline=~/^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@(.*)/) {
> + my $context = $4;
> $realline=$1-1;
> if (defined $2) {
> $realcnt=$3+1;
> @@ -2201,6 +2203,12 @@ sub process {
> }
> $in_comment = 0;
>
> + if ($context =~ /\b(\w+)\s*\(/) {
> + $context_function = $1;
> + } else {
> + undef $context_function;
> + }
> +
> # Guestimate if this is a continuing comment. Run
> # the context looking for a comment "edge". If this
> # edge is a close comment then we must be in a comment
> @@ -5157,6 +5165,16 @@ sub process {
> "break quoted strings at a space character\n" . $hereprev);
> }
>
> +#check for an embedded function name in a string when the function is known
> +# as part of a diff. This does not work for -f --file checking as it
> +#depends on patch context providing the function name
> + if ($line =~ /^\+.*$String/ &&
> + defined($context_function) &&
> + get_quoted_string($line, $rawline) =~ /\b$context_function\b/) {
> + WARN("EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME",
> + "Prefer using \"%s\", __func__ to embedded function names\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> +
> # check for spaces before a quoted newline
> if ($rawline =~ /^.*\".*\s\\n/) {
> if (WARN("QUOTED_WHITESPACE_BEFORE_NEWLINE",
> --
> 2.10.0.rc2.1.g053435c
>

Looks sane enough to me.

Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-apw