Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: host: s3cmci: allow probing from device tree

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Thu Dec 29 2016 - 06:42:01 EST


On 9 December 2016 at 14:14, Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allows configuring Samsung S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller using a device
> tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/s3cmci.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/s3cmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/s3cmci.c
> index 932a4b1fed33..bfeb90e8ffee 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/s3cmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/s3cmci.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>
> #include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
> #include <mach/dma.h>
> @@ -127,6 +130,22 @@ enum dbg_channels {
> dbg_conf = (1 << 8),
> };
>
> +struct s3cmci_drv_data {
> + int is2440;

This doesn't say much.

Please use a more descriptive variable name and rename the struct to
perhaps "variant_data", because I guess that is what this is?

> +};
> +
> +static const struct s3cmci_drv_data s3c2410_s3cmci_drv_data = {
> + .is2440 = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct s3cmci_drv_data s3c2412_s3cmci_drv_data = {
> + .is2440 = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct s3cmci_drv_data s3c2440_s3cmci_drv_data = {
> + .is2440 = 1,
> +};
> +
> static const int dbgmap_err = dbg_fail;
> static const int dbgmap_info = dbg_info | dbg_conf;
> static const int dbgmap_debug = dbg_err | dbg_debug;
> @@ -1241,8 +1260,9 @@ static void s3cmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> case MMC_POWER_ON:
> case MMC_POWER_UP:
> /* Configure GPE5...GPE10 pins in SD mode */
> - s3c_gpio_cfgall_range(S3C2410_GPE(5), 6, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2),
> - S3C_GPIO_PULL_NONE);
> + if (!host->pdev->dev.of_node)
> + s3c_gpio_cfgall_range(S3C2410_GPE(5), 6, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2),
> + S3C_GPIO_PULL_NONE);
>
> if (host->pdata->set_power)
> host->pdata->set_power(ios->power_mode, ios->vdd);
> @@ -1254,7 +1274,8 @@ static void s3cmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>
> case MMC_POWER_OFF:
> default:
> - gpio_direction_output(S3C2410_GPE(5), 0);
> + if (!host->pdev->dev.of_node)
> + gpio_direction_output(S3C2410_GPE(5), 0);
>
> if (host->is2440)
> mci_con |= S3C2440_SDICON_SDRESET;
> @@ -1544,21 +1565,12 @@ static inline void s3cmci_debugfs_remove(struct s3cmci_host *host) { }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>
> -static int s3cmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int s3cmci_probe_pdata(struct s3cmci_host *host)
> {
> - struct s3cmci_host *host;
> - struct mmc_host *mmc;
> - int ret;
> - int is2440;
> - int i;
> + struct platform_device *pdev = host->pdev;
> + int i, ret;
>
> - is2440 = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> -
> - mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct s3cmci_host), &pdev->dev);
> - if (!mmc) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto probe_out;
> - }
> + host->is2440 = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>
> for (i = S3C2410_GPE(5); i <= S3C2410_GPE(10); i++) {
> ret = gpio_request(i, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> @@ -1568,14 +1580,90 @@ static int s3cmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i--; i >= S3C2410_GPE(5); i--)
> gpio_free(i);
>
> - goto probe_free_host;
> + return ret;
> }
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int s3cmci_probe_dt(struct s3cmci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = host->pdev;
> + struct s3c24xx_mci_pdata *pdata;
> + const struct s3cmci_drv_data *drvdata;
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> + int gpio, ret;
> +
> + drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!drvdata)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + host->is2440 = drvdata->is2440;

Instead of copying only the member, perhaps assign a host->variant
pointer to the drvdata instead, as that allows to extend the
information for the variant to cover more things than only "is2440",
while going forward.

In other words:

host->variant = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);

> +
> + ret = mmc_of_parse(mmc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pdata->ocr_avail = mmc->ocr_avail;
> +
> + if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
> + pdata->no_wprotect = 1;
> +
> + if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
> + pdata->no_detect = 1;
> +
> + if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> + pdata->wprotect_invert = 1;
> +
> + if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> + pdata->detect_invert = 1;
> +
> + gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, "cd-gpios", 0);

This should already be covered via mmc_of_parse().

> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> + pdata->gpio_detect = gpio;
> + gpio_free(gpio);
> + }
> +
> + gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, "wp-gpios", 0);

This should already be covered via mmc_of_parse().

> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> + pdata->gpio_wprotect = gpio;
> + gpio_free(gpio);
> + }
> +
> + pdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int s3cmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct s3cmci_host *host;
> + struct mmc_host *mmc;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct s3cmci_host), &pdev->dev);
> + if (!mmc) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto probe_out;
> + }
> +
> host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> host->mmc = mmc;
> host->pdev = pdev;
> - host->is2440 = is2440;
> +
> + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> + ret = s3cmci_probe_dt(host);
> + else
> + ret = s3cmci_probe_pdata(host);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto probe_free_host;
>
> host->pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> if (!host->pdata) {
> @@ -1586,7 +1674,7 @@ static int s3cmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> spin_lock_init(&host->complete_lock);
> tasklet_init(&host->pio_tasklet, pio_tasklet, (unsigned long) host);
>
> - if (is2440) {
> + if (host->is2440) {
> host->sdiimsk = S3C2440_SDIIMSK;
> host->sdidata = S3C2440_SDIDATA;
> host->clk_div = 1;
> @@ -1789,8 +1877,9 @@ static int s3cmci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> release_mem_region(host->mem->start, resource_size(host->mem));
>
> probe_free_gpio:
> - for (i = S3C2410_GPE(5); i <= S3C2410_GPE(10); i++)
> - gpio_free(i);
> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> + for (i = S3C2410_GPE(5); i <= S3C2410_GPE(10); i++)
> + gpio_free(i);
>
> probe_free_host:
> mmc_free_host(mmc);
> @@ -1837,9 +1926,9 @@ static int s3cmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!pd->no_detect)
> gpio_free(pd->gpio_detect);
>
> - for (i = S3C2410_GPE(5); i <= S3C2410_GPE(10); i++)
> - gpio_free(i);
> -
> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> + for (i = S3C2410_GPE(5); i <= S3C2410_GPE(10); i++)
> + gpio_free(i);
>
> iounmap(host->base);
> release_mem_region(host->mem->start, resource_size(host->mem));
> @@ -1848,6 +1937,23 @@ static int s3cmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id s3cmci_dt_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-sdi",
> + .data = &s3c2410_s3cmci_drv_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "samsung,s3c2412-sdi",
> + .data = &s3c2412_s3cmci_drv_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "samsung,s3c2440-sdi",
> + .data = &s3c2440_s3cmci_drv_data,
> + },
> + { /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_s3c_dt_match);
> +
> static const struct platform_device_id s3cmci_driver_ids[] = {
> {
> .name = "s3c2410-sdi",
> @@ -1867,6 +1973,7 @@ static int s3cmci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static struct platform_driver s3cmci_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "s3c-sdi",
> + .of_match_table = s3cmci_dt_match,
> },
> .id_table = s3cmci_driver_ids,
> .probe = s3cmci_probe,
> --
> 1.9.1
>

Kind regards
Uffe