Re: [PATCH 1/3] extcon: Add documentation for EXTCON_CHG_USB_* and EXTCON_USB_*
From: Baolin Wang
Date: Wed Dec 21 2016 - 02:53:50 EST
Hi,
On 21 December 2016 at 15:20, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016ë 12ì 21ì 15:10, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Current there is both "EXTCON_USB" and "EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP" which
>> both seem to suggest a standard downstream port. But there is no
>> documentation describing how these relate.
>>
>> Thus add documentation to describe EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
>> appear together with EXTCON_USB, and EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA would normally
>> appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/extcon.h | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/extcon.h b/include/linux/extcon.h
>> index b871c0c..6498b05 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/extcon.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/extcon.h
>> @@ -46,7 +46,14 @@
>> #define EXTCON_USB 1
>> #define EXTCON_USB_HOST 2
>>
>> -/* Charging external connector */
>> +/*
>> + * Charging external connector
>> + *
>> + * When one SDP charger connector was reported, we should also report
>> + * the USB connector, which means EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
>> + * appear together with EXTCON_USB. The same as ACA charger connector,
>> + * EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA should always appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>> + */
>
> Looks good to me.
> But, you use the different word for ACA as following:
> I think that 'would normally' is proper in descritpion.
Okay, I will change to 'would normally' in next version patch. Thanks.
>
> - commit msg : EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA would normally appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
> - description: EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA should always appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>
>> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP 5 /* Standard Downstream Port */
>> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP 6 /* Dedicated Charging Port */
>> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP 7 /* Charging Downstream Port */
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards