Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: da850: fix da850_set_pll0rate()

[Viresh Kumar]

Good to see you again Bartosz :)

On 02-12-16, 16:38, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq
> table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when
> called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked
> either.
> 
> Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and
> selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported
> rates.
> 
> Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this
> clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to
> clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock
> rate in Hz.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> index a55101c..92e3303 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index)
>  	return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index);
>  }
>  
> -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index)
> +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>  {
> -	unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv;
> -	struct da850_opp *opp;
>  	struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data;
> +	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
> +	unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv;
> +	struct da850_opp *opp = NULL;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data;
> +	for (freq = da850_freq_table;
> +	     freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) {
> +		/* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */
> +		unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000;
> +
> +		if (freq_rate == rate) {
> +			opp = (struct da850_opp *)freq->driver_data;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (opp == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	prediv = opp->prediv;
>  	mult = opp->mult;
>  	postdiv = opp->postdiv;
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
> index b95a872..d54a27c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx);
> +	ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, new_freq * 1000);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

I haven't checked the internal of davinci or the way rate is changed now, but
from cpufreq's perspective, fee free to add my:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh