[PATCH] x86/alternatives: Do not use sync_core() to serialize I$

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sat Dec 03 2016 - 10:03:07 EST


On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:28:44PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Ah, it is called only from apply_alternatives() but sure, it is safer
> this way. Lemme do that and run it through the boxes to see whether
> anything catches fire.

Looks good, ran it on a bunch of machines, two of them huge AMD and
Intel, 8-socket monsters.

Here is a version with a commit message:

---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 23:18:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Do not use sync_core() to serialize I$

We use sync_core() in the alternatives code to stop speculative
execution of prefetched instructions because we are potentially changing
them and don't want to execute stale bytes.

What it does on most machines is call CPUID which is a serializing
instruction. And that's expensive.

However, the instruction cache is serialized when we're on the local CPU
and are changing the data through the same virtual address. So then, we
don't need the serializing CPUID but a simple control flow change. Last
being accomplished with a CALL/RET which the noinline causes.

So let's try it.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 5cb272a7a5a3..c5b8f760473c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -337,7 +337,11 @@ recompute_jump(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *orig_insn, u8 *repl_insn, u8 *insnbuf)
n_dspl, (unsigned long)orig_insn + n_dspl + repl_len);
}

-static void __init_or_module optimize_nops(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *instr)
+/*
+ * "noinline" to cause control flow change and thus invalidate I$ and
+ * cause refetch after modification.
+ */
+static void __init_or_module noinline optimize_nops(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *instr)
{
unsigned long flags;

@@ -346,7 +350,6 @@ static void __init_or_module optimize_nops(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *instr)

local_irq_save(flags);
add_nops(instr + (a->instrlen - a->padlen), a->padlen);
- sync_core();
local_irq_restore(flags);

DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%p: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: ",
@@ -359,9 +362,12 @@ static void __init_or_module optimize_nops(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *instr)
* This implies that asymmetric systems where APs have less capabilities than
* the boot processor are not handled. Tough. Make sure you disable such
* features by hand.
+ *
+ * Marked "noinline" to cause control flow change and thus insn cache
+ * to refetch changed I$ lines.
*/
-void __init_or_module apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
- struct alt_instr *end)
+void __init_or_module noinline apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
+ struct alt_instr *end)
{
struct alt_instr *a;
u8 *instr, *replacement;
@@ -667,7 +673,6 @@ void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
- sync_core();
local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Could also do a CLFLUSH here to speed up CPU recovery; but
that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs. */
--
2.11.0

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.