Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, page_alloc: Keep pcp count and list contents in sync if struct page is corrupted

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Fri Dec 02 2016 - 05:18:09 EST


On Fri 02-12-16 17:30:07, Hillf Danton wrote:
[...]
> > >> @@ -2217,13 +2217,14 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> > >> else
> > >> list_add_tail(&page->lru, list);
> > >> list = &page->lru;
> > >> + alloced++;
> > >> if (is_migrate_cma(get_pcppage_migratetype(page)))
> > >> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES,
> > >> -(1 << order));
> > >> }
> > >> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(i << order));
> > >
> > > Now i is a pure index, yes?
> >
> > No, even if a page fails the check_pcp_refill() check and is not
> > "allocated", it is also no longer a free page, so it's correct to
> > subtract it from NR_FREE_PAGES.
> >
> Yes, we can allocate free page next time.

No we cannot. The page is gone from the free list. We have effectively
leaked it.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs