Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] tpm: replace dynamically allocated bios_dir with a static array

From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Tue Nov 22 2016 - 11:59:15 EST


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:23:33PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:50AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > This commit is based on a commit by Nayna Jain. Replaced dynamically
> > allocated bios_dir with a static array as the size is always constant.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here
> so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put
> this into the pull request.

Nayna must have tested it, looks OK to me..

> > +err:
> > + chip->bios_dir[cnt] = NULL;
> > + tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
> > + return -EIO;

Except that return should ideally be PTR_ERR(chip->bios_dir[cnt])

.. and we still set ERR_PTR into bios_dir in the ENODEV case, so the
overall series is still broken if securityfs is compiled out.

Lets fix this all like this - which is a good enough reason to leave the
ENODEV detect alone - just squash this into your patch:

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c
index 2a15b866ac257a..11bb1138a8282e 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_eventlog.c
@@ -356,15 +356,6 @@ static const struct file_operations tpm_bios_measurements_ops = {
.release = tpm_bios_measurements_release,
};

-static int is_bad(void *p)
-{
- if (!p)
- return 1;
- if (IS_ERR(p) && (PTR_ERR(p) != -ENODEV))
- return 1;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int tpm_read_log(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
int rc;
@@ -390,7 +381,8 @@ static int tpm_read_log(struct tpm_chip *chip)
* If an event log is found then the securityfs files are setup to
* export it to userspace, otherwise nothing is done.
*
- * Returns -ENODEV if the firmware has no event log.
+ * Returns -ENODEV if the firmware has no event log or securityfs is not
+ * supported.
*/
int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
@@ -407,7 +399,10 @@ int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip)

cnt = 0;
chip->bios_dir[cnt] = securityfs_create_dir(name, NULL);
- if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
+ /* NOTE: securityfs_create_dir can return ENODEV if securityfs is
+ * compiled out. The caller should ignore the ENODEV return code.
+ */
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
goto err;
cnt++;

@@ -419,7 +414,7 @@ int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
0440, chip->bios_dir[0],
(void *)&chip->bin_log_seqops,
&tpm_bios_measurements_ops);
- if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
goto err;
cnt++;

@@ -431,16 +426,17 @@ int tpm_bios_log_setup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
0440, chip->bios_dir[0],
(void *)&chip->ascii_log_seqops,
&tpm_bios_measurements_ops);
- if (is_bad(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->bios_dir[cnt]))
goto err;
cnt++;

return 0;

err:
+ rc = PTR_ERR(chip->bios_dir[cnt]);
chip->bios_dir[cnt] = NULL;
tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
- return -EIO;
+ return rc;
}

void tpm_bios_log_teardown(struct tpm_chip *chip)