Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition

[David Hildenbrand]

Am 16.11.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
> the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
> s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield
> in sched.h.
>
> Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

David