Re: [BUG] perf report --pid not reporting correctly

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Wed Sep 21 2016 - 12:35:03 EST


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf report.
> >
> > I do a system-wide collection and then I want to narrow down the
> > reporting to a specific process:
> >
> > $ perf record -a -e cycles:pp sleep 10
> > $ perf report --sort cpu,comm --pid X
> >
> > Where X is a process sampled during the run (easy to catch with perf report -D)
> > If you do it this way, it works, but if you do:
> >
> > $ perf report --sort cpu --pid X
> >
> > Then you get an empty output.
> >
> > I suspect it has to do with the way hist entries are added to the
> > histogram and aggregated. If the first event for a sort criteria is
> > not coming from pid X, it will
> > still be added in the histogram. if pid X aggregates to the same
> > sample criteria, then you will lose the pid information. And then
> > later when you try to apply the filter,
> > it will mark the hist entry as FILTERED because it does not have a matching pid
> > and nothing will be printed.
> > I suspect you want to apply the filtering upfront for pid. It will
> > only add to the histograms matching samples. It changes the
> > percentages you will see. They will
> > only report the breakdown for the pid.
> >
> > I have a quick hack to do upfront filtering which does something as
> > follows but I am not sure this is the correct way of doing this.
> >
> > Let me know what you think.
>
> From a first look I think this makes sense, i.e. we should do the first
> round of filtering, one that trows away stuff, for things in the command
> line, when creating the histogram entries.
>
> Later, as we have now, we can apply further filters for non-collapsed
> fields of hist_entry.
>
> Jiri, Namhyung, are you ok with this?

Stephan is correct with analysis, but I think we need to add both non/filtered
entries in, because we provide that 'F' key for non/filtered counts switch in tui

how about something like below

thanks,
jirka

---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index b02992efb513..659e0357be68 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -536,6 +536,14 @@ static struct hist_entry *hists__findnew_entry(struct hists *hists,
map__put(he->ms.map);
he->ms.map = map__get(entry->ms.map);
}
+
+ /*
+ * We have at least one entry in which is not
+ * filtered, we want to display the entry.
+ */
+ if (he->filtered && !entry->filtered)
+ he->filtered = 0;
+
goto out;
}