Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format

[Andi Kleen]

> hi,
> I had discussion with Ingo about the state of this patchset
> and there's one more requirement from his side - to split
> event files into per topic files

Thanks Jiri.
> 
> I made some initial changes over latest Sukadev's branch
> and came up with something like this:

Did you just split it by the "Topic" fields?

> 
> 	$ find pmu-events/arch/x86/
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Memory.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Virtual-Memory.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Cache.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Pipeline.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Floating-point.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Other.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Memory.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Virtual-Memory.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Cache.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Pipeline.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Floating-point.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Other.json
> 	pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Frontend.json
> 
> so let's have a discussion if this is acceptable for you guys

Splitting is fine for me, as long as it's scriptable.

I already have some scripts to generate the perf json files,
can update them to split.

> 
> I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support
> this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and
> it's not that bad ;-)

Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes.

-Andi