Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:53:53 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Egads!  OK, I see why this is a mess.

:-)

> 
> I guess we should be creating the metadata from the syscall tables
> instead of from the syscall definitions, but I guess that's currently
> a nasty per-arch mess.

Yep.

> 
> Could we at least have an array of (arch, nr) instead of just an array
> of nrs in the metadata?

I guess I'm not following you on what would be used for "arch".

-- Steve