Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

[Heikki Krogerus]

Hi Guenter,

> > Overall this is quite vague and, especially for chargers, most of the time
> > misses the point.
> > 
> > I would really prefer if we could stay closer to the specification in this
> > case, and not try to merge multiple orthogonal attributes into one.
> 
> OK. So what would you propose?

I'm actually only conserned about the accessory case, as there we are
really not a source/sink/DRP, nor are we DPF/UFP/DRD. Should we use
this attribute to only express if the type of the partner is "normal"
or an accessory?


Thanks,

-- 
heikki