Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5260: Move struct samsung_cmu_info to init section

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Stephen,

On 2016ë 08ì 25ì 09:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/24, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2016ë 08ì 24ì 13:43, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 08/23, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>> So the saving is rather insignificant but the patch doesn't make
>>>> things worse and I'd say it might be worth applying.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds good. This sort of information should be in the commit
>>> text though. Talking about const doesn't make any sense to me.
>>
>> Do you mean that 'const' is initconst secion?
> 
> No. Marking it as initconst in the patch is correct.

OK.

> 
>> If possible, could you explain the anything
>> why you don't make sense about 'const'?
>>
> 
> I'm just saying that the reasoning to move it from the text
> section to the data section shouldn't be because of const. There
> should be better reasons to do this, like size benefits.
> 

As I already said, the samsung_cmu_register_on() requires
the 'const' type argument for 'struct samsung_cmu_info'.

So, I defined the instance on the out of the exynos5260_clk_aud_init() as following:
	static const struct samsung_cmu_info aud_cmu __initconst = {

How can i add the 'const' keyword and '__initsecion' to the 
"struct samsung_cmu_info aud_cmu" in the "static void __init 
exynos5260_clk_aud_init(struct device_node *np)"?

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi