Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: Introduce ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Mon Aug 22 2016 - 04:04:02 EST


On Mon 22-08-16 10:56:42, Xie Yisheng wrote:
> Avoid making ifdef get pretty unwieldy if many ARCHs support gigantic page.
> No functional change with this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yisheng <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> fs/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index e751fe2..a8c8fa3 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config S390
> select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
> select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
> select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
> + select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> select ARCH_HAS_KCOV
> select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index c580d8c..5cf959c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ config X86
> select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
> select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER
> select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
> + select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE if X86_64
> select ARCH_HAS_KCOV if X86_64
> select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API if X86_64
> select ARCH_HAS_MMIO_FLUSH

good

> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 2bc7ad7..b77ad0f 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ config HUGETLBFS
> config HUGETLB_PAGE
> def_bool HUGETLBFS
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> + depends on HUGETLB_PAGE
> + bool
> +

but is this really necessary? The code where we use
ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE already depends on HUGETLB_PAGE.

Other than that looks good to me and a nice simplification.

> source "fs/configfs/Kconfig"
> source "fs/efivarfs/Kconfig"
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 87e11d8..8488dcc 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> ((node = hstate_next_node_to_free(hs, mask)) || 1); \
> nr_nodes--)
>
> -#if (defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_S390)) && \
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE) && \
> ((defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION) && defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION)) || \
> defined(CONFIG_CMA))
> static void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> --
> 1.7.12.4

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs