Re: [PATCH 04/13] scpi: Add legacy SCP functions calling legacy_scpi_send_message

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Fri Aug 19 2016 - 12:22:33 EST




On 18/08/16 11:10, Neil Armstrong wrote:
In order to support legacy SCP functions from kernel-wide driver, add legacy
functions using the legacy command enums and calling legacy_scpi_send_message.

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index 50b1297..bb9965f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -578,6 +578,8 @@ scpi_clk_get_range(u16 clk_id, unsigned long *min, unsigned long *max)
return ret;
}

+/* scpi_clk_get_range not available for legacy */
+
static unsigned long scpi_clk_get_val(u16 clk_id)
{
int ret;
@@ -589,6 +591,18 @@ static unsigned long scpi_clk_get_val(u16 clk_id)
return ret ? ret : le32_to_cpu(clk.rate);
}

+static unsigned long legacy_scpi_clk_get_val(u16 clk_id)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct clk_get_value clk;
+ __le16 le_clk_id = cpu_to_le16(clk_id);
+
+ ret = legacy_scpi_send_message(LEGACY_SCPI_CMD_GET_CLOCK_VALUE,
+ &le_clk_id, sizeof(le_clk_id),
+ &clk, sizeof(clk));
+ return ret ? ret : le32_to_cpu(clk.rate);
+}
+
static int scpi_clk_set_val(u16 clk_id, unsigned long rate)
{
int stat;
@@ -601,6 +615,19 @@ static int scpi_clk_set_val(u16 clk_id, unsigned long rate)
&stat, sizeof(stat));
}

+static int legacy_scpi_clk_set_val(u16 clk_id, unsigned long rate)
+{
+ int stat;
+ struct legacy_clk_set_value clk = {
+ .id = cpu_to_le16(clk_id),
+ .rate = cpu_to_le32(rate)
+ };
+
+ return legacy_scpi_send_message(LEGACY_SCPI_CMD_SET_CLOCK_VALUE,
+ &clk, sizeof(clk),
+ &stat, sizeof(stat));

Except this one which has a different structure format, why do we need
to define legacy versions of other functions ? Can't we play with
function pointer or have a boolean in drvinfo structure and use then in
the existing functions as I had shown in one of the earlier emails.

--
Regards,
Sudeep