Re: [PATCH] thermal: armada: add support for suspend/resume

From: Zhang Rui
Date: Fri Aug 19 2016 - 09:06:44 EST


On å, 2016-07-21 at 12:43 +0200, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
> There is no need to implement subroutine for suspend since there is
> no
> data to store before suspending.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Ezequiel,

what do you think of this patch?

thanks,
rui
> ---
> Âdrivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> Â1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> index ae75328..65f9838 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> @@ -304,12 +304,26 @@ static int armada_thermal_exit(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> Â return 0;
> Â}
> Â
> +static int armada_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thermal_zone_device *thermal =
> + dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct armada_thermal_priv *priv = thermal->devdata;
> +
> + priv->data->init_sensor(to_platform_device(dev), priv);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(armada_thermal_pm_ops, NULL,
> armada_thermal_resume);
> +
> Âstatic struct platform_driver armada_thermal_driver = {
> Â .probe = armada_thermal_probe,
> Â .remove = armada_thermal_exit,
> Â .driver = {
> Â .name = "armada_thermal",
> Â .of_match_table = armada_thermal_id_table,
> + .pm = &armada_thermal_pm_ops,
> Â },
> Â};
> Â