Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: Cap array access in timekeeping_debug to protect against invalid sleep times

[Chen Yu]

On 2016å08æ18æ 09:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If pm_trace_enabled is set, we can (or maybe even should) just skip
> timekeeping_inject_sleeptime() entirely in rtc_resume() at least, because
> sleep_time is almost certainly bogus in that case, even if it doesn't
> overflow.
>
> Of course, the above is still needed then.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
OK, I'll provide another version on top of John's patch and consider the 
pm_trace. thanks.
Yu