Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression

From: Xin Long
Date: Wed Aug 17 2016 - 01:41:15 EST


> The perf-profile data for the two commits are attached(for the case of
> prsctp_enable=1, the perf-profile data doesn't get collected for the 0
> case for some reason, I'm checking the problem now).
>
> The CPU gets much more idle time in the bisected commit a6c2f79287:
>
> 68.89% 0.70% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> 49.32% 0.12% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sys_sendmsg
> 49.17% 0.12% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __sys_sendmsg
> 48.58% 0.22% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ___sys_sendmsg
> 46.69% 0.06% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sock_sendmsg
> 46.31% 0.16% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] inet_sendmsg
> 45.90% 0.98% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_sendmsg
> 29.66% 0.45% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_do_sm
> 29.54% 0.23% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry
> 28.81% 0.68% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_cmd_interpreter.isra.24
> 26.20% 0.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary
> 23.04% 0.09% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_inq_push
> 23.03% 0.08% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle
> 22.94% 0.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter
> 22.60% 0.18% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter_state
> 21.99% 21.99% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle
> ... ...
>
> While its immediate parent commit 826d253d57 is mostly busy working:
>
> 98.53% 0.83% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
> 78.13% 0.12% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sys_sendmsg
> 78.03% 0.16% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __sys_sendmsg
> 77.08% 0.28% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ___sys_sendmsg
> 74.44% 0.08% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sock_sendmsg
> 73.82% 0.13% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] inet_sendmsg
> 73.34% 1.44% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_sendmsg
> 47.52% 0.75% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_do_sm
> 46.19% 0.90% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_cmd_interpreter.isra.24
> 37.17% 1.43% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_outq_flush
> 36.93% 0.08% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_outq_uncork
> 34.24% 0.15% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sctp_inq_push
> ... ...
> No idle related function above 1%.
>
> Will the bisected commit make the idle possible?
No, not at all. :)

pls help to debug as I said in the last reply.