Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/7] Restartable sequences system call

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Aug 10 2016 - 16:02:40 EST


On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:41:47PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> #ifdef __LP64__
>
> static bool rseq_update_cpu_id_event_counter(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> union rseq_cpu_event u;
>
> u.e.cpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id();
> u.e.event_counter = ++t->rseq_event_counter;
> if (__put_user(u.v, &t->rseq->u.v))
> return false;
> trace_rseq_inc(t->rseq_event_counter);
> return true;
> }
>
> #else /* #ifdef __LP64__ */
>
> static bool rseq_update_cpu_id_event_counter(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> if (__put_user(raw_smp_processor_id(), &t->rseq->u.e.cpu_id))
> return false;
> if (__put_user(++t->rseq_event_counter, &t->rseq->u.e.event_counter))
> return false;
> trace_rseq_inc(t->rseq_event_counter);
> return true;
> }
>
> #endif /* #else #ifdef __LP64__ */

I don't think you need to guard it (and CONFIG_64BIT is the 'right'
kernel symbol for that), 32bit should have u64 __put_user() only
implemented as 2 u32 stores.