Re: [PATCH 0/5] ipc/msg: Sender/receiver optimizations

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Aug 09 2016 - 08:44:37 EST


On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:44:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm resending Sebastian's sysv msg queue use of wake_qs but updated
> > to the last observations I need wrt the need of explicit barriers
> > after removing the whole receiver busy-looping. After some irc exchange
> > it seems we're both on the same page, and things now look like he had
> > them earlier, in v2. This is all patch 1.
> >
> > The rest of the patches are changes I noticed while reviewing patch 1,
> > which are mainly sender-side rework/optimizations. Details are in each
> > changelog.
> >
> > The changes have survived ltp (which has some nasty corner cases for msgsnd
> > changes), as well as pmsg-shared benchmark.
>
> Not really my area, but over all the patches look good.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Andrew, will you pick these up, or should I route then through
tip/locking or something?