Re: [RFC 02/18] cgroup_pids: track maximum pids

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Jul 19 2016 - 14:13:44 EST


On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:59:18PM +0000, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> With the example systemd-timesyncd case, I was only getting 1 as the
> highwatermark, but there were already two tasks.

Can you please find out why that is so? Given that that's where we
charge pid usage, it doesn't make sense to me that you're getting
lower numbers than actual usage there.

Thanks.

--
tejun