Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe()

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 21:00 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 20:50:09 +0200
> 
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Return directly after a failed kzalloc()
>   Remove two OOM messages
> 
>  drivers/input/serio/at32psif.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

What possible rationale is there for including this "references" header?
566ABCD9.1060404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This message id is for your message:
	"Source code review around jump label usage"
sent December 11, 2015!

Please stop adding unnecessary and useless email headers.