Re: [PATCH] usb: host: Allow EHCI_OMAP to be built-in when USB_GADGET is 'm'

From: Roger Quadros
Date: Fri Jul 01 2016 - 04:11:33 EST


On 01/07/16 10:57, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes:
>>>> NOP_USB_XCEIV is used not only by gadget drivers but by
>>>> host drivers as well e.g. EHCI_OMAP.
>>>>
>>>> commit 5a8d651a2bde ("usb: gadget: move gadget API functions to udc-core")
>>>> made it so that NOP_USB_XCEIV can't be built-in if USB_GADGET is 'm'.
>>>> But this prevents EHCI_OMAP to be built-in if USB_GADGET is 'm'.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this undesired behaviour by moving usb_gadget_vbus_connect/disconnect()
>>>> to usb/gadget.h so that NOP_USB_XCEIV has no build dependency
>>>> on USB_GADGET.
>>>>
>>>> Retain the original Kconfig behaviour i.e. NOP_USB_XCEIV is selected
>>>> by drivers that need it.
>>>
>>> no, this is the wrong way to fix this. NOP _has_ a dependency on the
>>> Gadget API if it calls Gadget API functions. Dependencies are proper.
>>>
>>> Maybe the reason for the problem is that we ended up adding far too much
>>> code to phy-generic.c itself. Maybe it shouldn't know about clks and
>>> interrupts. The original idea of that driver was to simply satisfy a
>>> requirement to have a valid transceiver by some platforms. Maybe we
>>> should fix that instead. Moving functions around to workaround a problem
>>> is not the way to go, sorry.
>>>
>> OK but something that was working all these years is broken by your
>> patch.
>> Do you mind fixing it please? Or at least let me know how you want to
>> get it fixed.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> index 2e710a4cca52..89fd095ca33d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ config USB_EHCI_MXC
> config USB_EHCI_HCD_OMAP
> tristate "EHCI support for OMAP3 and later chips"
> depends on ARCH_OMAP
> - depends on NOP_USB_XCEIV
> + depends on USB_PHY
> default y
> ---help---
> Enables support for the on-chip EHCI controller on
>
>
This doesn't fix the real problem. i.e. we can't have NFS root on pandaboard
and omap5_uevm because network device is on USB EHCI, unless we have
both USB_GADGET and NOP_USB_XCEVI built-in, which is not really that
desirable.

cheers,
-roger