Re: [PATCH] torture: use ktime_t consistently

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:29:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 11:21:05 AM CEST Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:56:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >  
> > @@ -446,9 +447,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(torture_shuffle_cleanup);
> >   * Variables for auto-shutdown.  This allows "lights out" torture runs
> >   * to be fully scripted.
> >   */
> > -static int shutdown_secs;		/* desired test duration in seconds. */
> > +static ktime_t shutdown_ms;		/* desired test duration in seconds. */
> 
> the variable name is a bit odd.

The comment is certainly now wrong, good catch!

If there was an s_to_ktime(), I would have kept the old name, but I could
not find one.  Possibly due to me being blind...

> > @@ -511,10 +513,10 @@ int torture_shutdown_init(int ssecs, void (*cleanup)(void))
> >  {
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  
> > -	shutdown_secs = ssecs;
> >  	torture_shutdown_hook = cleanup;
> > -	if (shutdown_secs > 0) {
> > -		shutdown_time = jiffies + shutdown_secs * HZ;
> > +	if (ssecs > 0) {
> > +		shutdown_ms = ms_to_ktime(ssecs * 1000ULL);
> > +		shutdown_time = ktime_add(ktime_get(), shutdown_ms);
> >  		ret = torture_create_kthread(torture_shutdown, NULL,
> >  					     shutdown_task);
> 
> and I picked ktime_set(ssecs, 0) instead of ms_to_ktime(ssecs * 1000ULL), but
> both differences are just cosmetic and should end up in exactly the
> same object code that I suggested. Unless we both made the same mistake,
> your version should be good too.

Thank you for looking it over!  My I apply your Acked-by:, Reviewed-by:,
or some such?

							Thanx, Paul