[PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 088/206] irqchip/gic-v3: Configure all interrupts as non-secure Group-1

From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Thu Jun 09 2016 - 17:56:40 EST


4.2.8-ckt12 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>

commit 7c9b973061b03af62734f613f6abec46c0dd4a88 upstream.

The GICv3 driver wrongly assumes that it runs on the non-secure
side of a secure-enabled system, while it could be on a system
with a single security state, or a GICv3 with GICD_CTLR.DS set.

Either way, it is important to configure this properly, or
interrupts will simply not be delivered on this HW.

Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index f5c518b..0daa31d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -379,6 +379,15 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(void)
writel_relaxed(0, base + GICD_CTLR);
gic_dist_wait_for_rwp();

+ /*
+ * Configure SPIs as non-secure Group-1. This will only matter
+ * if the GIC only has a single security state. This will not
+ * do the right thing if the kernel is running in secure mode,
+ * but that's not the intended use case anyway.
+ */
+ for (i = 32; i < gic_data.irq_nr; i += 32)
+ writel_relaxed(~0, base + GICD_IGROUPR + i / 8);
+
gic_dist_config(base, gic_data.irq_nr, gic_dist_wait_for_rwp);

/* Enable distributor with ARE, Group1 */
@@ -482,6 +491,9 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)

rbase = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();

+ /* Configure SGIs/PPIs as non-secure Group-1 */
+ writel_relaxed(~0, rbase + GICR_IGROUPR0);
+
gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);

/* Give LPIs a spin */
--
2.7.4