Re: [PATCH] Input: pwm-beeper - defer pwm config if pwm can sleep

[Manfred Schlaegl]

On 2016-05-12 14:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> I agree with Dmitry. Users of the PWM API should always assume that
> calls to the PWM API might sleep. Conditionalizing on pwm_can_sleep()
> isn't a good idea, since that function is scheduled to be removed. In
> fact it's been returning true unconditionally since v4.5, so the fast
> path is dead code anyway.
> 

In this case, the decision is clear ;-)
I'll rework and send the new patch in the next days.

best regards,
manfred