Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: report error if excess data received

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Wed, May 11 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Also, returning -EOVERFLOW is not exactly correct here, because you'd
> violate POSIX specification of read(), right ?

Maybe we could piggyback on:

       EINVAL fd was created via a call to timerfd_create(2) and the
              wrong size buffer was given to read();

But I kinda agree.  Iâm not sure how much we need to care about this
instead of having user space round their buffers up to the nearest max
packet size boundary.

-- 
Best regards
ããã âðððð86â ãããããã
ÂIf at first you donât succeed, give up skydivingÂ