Re: [PATCH v7 16/24] i2c: allow adapter drivers to override the adapter locking

[Peter Rosin]

On 2016-05-03 23:39, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Yes, they look like reasonable complaints.
> 
> Thanks for fixing them. I just sent out my latest comments and when you
> fix those and send V8, I'll apply that right away. I think we are safe
> to fix the rest incrementally if needed. Note that I didn't review the

Sounds like a plan.

> IIO and media patches, I trust the reviewers on those.
> 
> Thanks for your work on this! I need a break now, this is
> mind-boggling...

And thanks for reviewing it!

A question on best practices here... I already did a v8 (but only as
a branch) so I think this will be v9, bit that's a minor detail. The
real question is what I should do about patches 1-15 that are already
in next? Send them too? If not, should I send 16-24 with the same old
patch numbers or should they be numbered 1-9 now? And should such a
shortened series be rebased on 1-15 in next?

Or does it not really matter?

Cheers,
Peter