Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: filemap: only do access activations on reads

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Apr 04 2016 - 17:22:39 EST


On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:13:37 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andres Freund observed that his database workload is struggling with
> the transaction journal creating pressure on frequently read pages.
>
> Access patterns like transaction journals frequently write the same
> pages over and over, but in the majority of cases those pages are
> never read back. There are no caching benefits to be had for those
> pages, so activating them and having them put pressure on pages that
> do benefit from caching is a bad choice.

Read-after-write is a pretty common pattern: temporary files for
example. What are the opportunities for regressions here?

Did you consider providing userspace with a way to hint "this file is
probably write-then-not-read"?