[tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Add comments to explain select_idle_sibling()

From: tip-bot for Matt Fleming
Date: Mon Mar 21 2016 - 07:17:48 EST


Commit-ID: d4335581dc30ec6545999c7443bb9fead274a980
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d4335581dc30ec6545999c7443bb9fead274a980
Author: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:59:08 +0000
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:52:51 +0100

sched/fair: Add comments to explain select_idle_sibling()

It's not entirely obvious how the main loop in select_idle_sibling()
works on first glance. Sprinkle a few comments to explain the design
and intention behind the loop based on some conversations with Mike
and Peter.

Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457535548-15329-1-git-send-email-matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 3c114d9..303d639 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5055,7 +5055,19 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
return i;

/*
- * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu.
+ * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an eligible idle cpu.
+ *
+ * A completely idle sched group at higher domains is more
+ * desirable than an idle group at a lower level, because lower
+ * domains have smaller groups and usually share hardware
+ * resources which causes tasks to contend on them, e.g. x86
+ * hyperthread siblings in the lowest domain (SMT) can contend
+ * on the shared cpu pipeline.
+ *
+ * However, while we prefer idle groups at higher domains
+ * finding an idle cpu at the lowest domain is still better than
+ * returning 'target', which we've already established, isn't
+ * idle.
*/
sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
@@ -5065,11 +5077,16 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
goto next;

+ /* Ensure the entire group is idle */
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
if (i == target || !idle_cpu(i))
goto next;
}

+ /*
+ * It doesn't matter which cpu we pick, the
+ * whole group is idle.
+ */
target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
goto done;