Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid

From: Kefeng Wang
Date: Sun Mar 06 2016 - 21:02:14 EST




On 2016/3/3 16:36, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2016, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>

>
> The below should take care of both issues, what do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
> <8-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: [PATCH] locktorture: Fix nil pointer dereferencing for cleanup paths
>
> It has been found that paths that invoke cleanups through
> lock_torture_cleanup() can incur in nil pointer dereferencing
> bugs during the statistics printing phase. This is mainly
> because we should not be calling into statistics before we are
> sure things have been setup correctly.
>
> Specifically, early checks (and the need for handling this in
> the cleanup call) only include parameter checks and basic
> statistics allocation. Once we start write/read kthreads
> we then consider the test as started. As such, update the func
> in question to check for cxt.lwsa writer stats, if not set,
> we either have a bogus parameter or ENOMEM situation and
> therefore only need to deal with general torture calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> XXX: while looking at the code, do we need at least a stat_interval > 0
> check before stopping the lock_torture_stats kthread?
>
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index 8ef1919..1942848 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,15 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
> if (torture_cleanup_begin())
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Indicates early cleanup, meaning that the test has not run,
> + * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module. As
> + * such, only perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups,
> + * and avoid anything related to locktorture.
> + */
> + if (!cxt.lwsa)
> + goto end;

Sorry for the late response, the cxt.lrsa should be taken into account too.

> +
> if (writer_tasks) {
> for (i = 0; i < cxt.nrealwriters_stress; i++)
> torture_stop_kthread(lock_torture_writer,
> @@ -776,6 +785,7 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
> else
> lock_torture_print_module_parms(cxt.cur_ops,
> "End of test: SUCCESS");
> +end:
> torture_cleanup_end();
> }
>
> @@ -878,6 +888,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
> cxt.lrsa[i].n_lock_acquired = 0;
> }
> }
> +
> lock_torture_print_module_parms(cxt.cur_ops, "Start of test");
>
> /* Prepare torture context. */