Re: [PATCH] futex: replace bare barrier() with more lightweight READ_ONCE()

From: Jianyu Zhan
Date: Thu Mar 03 2016 - 20:13:16 EST


On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought I provided a corrected comment block.... maybe I didn't. We have been
> working on improving the futex documentation, so we're paying close attention to
> terminology as well as grammar. This one needs a couple minor tweaks. I suggest:
>
> /*
> * Use READ_ONCE to forbid the compiler from reloading q->lock_ptr and
> * optimizing lock_ptr out of the logic below.
> */
>
> The bit about q->lock_ptr possibly changing is already covered by the large
> comment block below the spin_lock(lock_ptr) call.

The large comment block is explaining the why the retry logic is required.
To achieve this semantic requirement, the READ_ONCE is needed to prevent
compiler optimizing it by doing double loads.

So I think the comment above should explain this tricky part.

> /* Use READ_ONCE to forbid the compiler from reloading q->lock_ptr in spin_lock() */

And as for preventing from optimizing the lock_ptr out of the retry
code block, I have consult
Paul Mckenney, he suggests one more READ_ONCE should be added here:

if (unlikely(lock_ptr != READ_ONCE(q->lock_ptr))) {
<------------------------------
spin_unlock(lock_ptr);
goto retry;
}

And I think this are two problem, and should be separated into two patches?



Regards,
Jianyu Zhan